September 26th, 2012
12:37 PM ET

Opinion: Are we really ready to take a look at 'real women'?

Editor's note: Lesley Kinzel is an associate editor at xoJane.com and the author of "Two Whole Cakes: How to Stop Dieting and Learn to Love Your Body."

(CNN) - Designer Ralph Lauren is making model-related headlines again.

The last time this happened, it was when the iconic American branddigitally altered model Filippa Hamilton into a biologically impossible state, rendering her waist and pelvis in miniature and leaving the rest of her body normal-sized.

Astute critics noticed and spoke up. It didn't help matters when Hamilton herself stated that she was allegedly fired by the brand for being "too fat" by fashion world metrics.

More recently, however, the Ralph Lauren brand has made attempts to improve its image and hired Australian plus-size model Robyn Lawley, who stands 6-foot-2 and wears a size 12, for a print campaign. After the public relations nightmare with Hamilton, many have heralded this choice as a positive sign of improvement in a fashion industry that overwhelmingly hires and promotes models who are far thinner than the average American woman.

As is often the case when any plus-size model makes news, many are eager to hold this up as a victory for "real women," that anonymous majority who so rarely get to see themselves portrayed in fashion images.

But don't get too enthusiastic with the back-patting just yet.

This is not a revolutionary moment, any more than it has been any other time a mainstream designer has plucked a nonwaifish model from the depths of the plus-size-modeling dungeon and made her, however briefly, a public curiosity. Fashion is famously fickle, and if Ralph Lauren has chosen to showcase this particular model at this particular moment, it may have nothing to do with making some grand political statement or a significant change of heart and everything to do with generating buzz.

Of course, I can't know the brand's intentions for certain. But in the larger context, even widespread use of plus-size models doesn't signal the evolution of a movement away from the impossible feminine physical ideal; it's just taking that ideal and making it a tiny bit bigger.

Read Lesley Kinzel's full column

Posted by
Filed under: Age • How we live • What we think • Women
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. shojib

    Nice to know that some celebs are still humble and thankful for any and all praise that they receive. I really wish they
    would have dressed him a little better, instead of putting him in a tank tops and slacks, like he is going to the corner
    store for a couple of loosies and a quarter water. Anyway, you should check out Channing's old pictures back when he
    modeled. Back then, he was shutting it down like a chinese sweatshop!

    December 1, 2012 at 5:32 pm | Report abuse |
  2. Toolfreak

    'Real women' are apparently those who are overweight. Models are models for a reason. Clothes look better on women with certain figures. As a designer, you want your clothes to look their best in a catalog or on a runway.

    Just because a large group of women who spend too much time on the internet want to get upset that they don't magically look like a model after making poor lifestyle choices shouldn't mean that a designer should be forced to shift their focus. If you don't like being overweight, work towards losing weight. Don't complain about the thin people.

    October 4, 2012 at 2:18 am | Report abuse |